Index Entries

Bram Rochwerg, Thomas Agoritsas, François Lamontagne, Yee-Sin Leo, Helen Macdonald, Arnav Agarwal, Linan Zeng, Lyubov Lytvyn, John Adabie Appiah, Wagdy Amin, Yaseen Arabi, Lucille Blumberg, Erlina Burhan, Frederique Bausch, Carolyn S. Calfee, Bin Cao, Maurizio Cecconi, Duncan Chanda, Graham Cooke, Bin Du, Jake Dunning, Heike Geduld, Patrick Gee, Madiha Hashimi, David S. Hui, Sushil Kabra, Seema Kanda, Leticia Kawano-Dourado, Yae-Jean Kim, Niranjan Kissoon, Arthur Kwizera, Jon Henrik Laake, Flavia R. Machado, Imelda Mahaka, Hela Manai, Greta Mino, Emmanuel Nsutebu, Natalia Pshenichnaya, Nida Qadir, Saniya Sabzwari, Rohit Sarin, Michael Sharland, Yinzhong Shen, Shalini Sri Ranganathan, Joao Souza, Sebastian Ugarte, Sridhar Venkatapuram, Vu Quoc Dat, Dubula Vuyiseka, Ananda Wijewickrama, Brittany Maguire, Dena Zeraatkar, Jessica Bartoszko, Long Ge, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Reed Siemieniuk, Gordon Guyatt, Janet Diaz, Michael Jacobs, and Per Olav Vandvik
September 4, 2020
BMJ (British Medical Journal)
World Health Organization (WHO)

"Abstract

... New Recommendation: The latest version of this WHO living guidance focuses on remdesivir, following the 15 October 2020 preprint publication of results from the WHO SOLIDARITY trial. It contains a weak or conditional recommendation against the use of remdesivir in hospitalised patients with covid-19...

Understanding the New Recommendation: When moving from evidence to the conditional recommendation against the use of remdesivir in patients with covid-19, the panel emphasised the evidence suggesting no important effect on mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, time to clinical improvement, and other patient-important outcomes. Considering the low or very low certainty evidence for all outcomes, the panel interpreted the evidence as not proving that remdesivir is ineffective; rather there is no evidence based on currently available data that it does improve patient-important outcomes. The panel placed low value on small and uncertain benefits in the presence of the remaining possibility of important harms...

What triggered this version of the guideline? 

This second version of the WHO living guideline addresses the use of remdesivir in patients with covid-19. It follows the preprint publication of the WHO SOLIDARITY trial on 15 October 2020, reporting results on treatment with remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and lopinavir-ritonavir in hospitalised patients with covid-19... The WHO SOLIDARITY trial adds 11 266 randomised patients (2570 to remdesivir, 954 to hydroxychloroquine, and 1411 to lopinavir-ritonavir, 6331 to usual care) and holds the potential to change practice...

The guidance

Remdesivir

The recommendation addressing remdesivir was informed by results from a systematic review and network meta-analysis that pooled data from four randomised trials with 7333 participants hospitalised
for covid-19."

WHO recommendation against remdesivir

document
COVID-19,medical treatments,pharmaceuticals,remdesivir