Index Entries

Michael Nevradakis
December 18, 2024
The Defender
Children's Health Defense

"Children under 5 who received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines were more likely to become infected with COVID-19 than unvaccinated children who had natural immunity, according to data in a 'bombshell' peer-reviewed study by Centers for Disease Control and Protection (CDC) scientists.

... the authors of the study... didn’t highlight that finding in their conclusion...

The authors recommended COVID-19 vaccination 'to reduce severe illness,' but conceded the 'overall risk of infection may not differ substantially between vaccinated and unvaccinated' children under 5.

... Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D., said the study 'definitively proves' that natural immunity 'is more effective than vaccine immunity.'

Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation, said the study shows the vaccines 'do the opposite of what they’re supposed to do. Instead of protecting against COVID-19, these genetic injections either fail or increase the risk of infection.'

... one of the study’s key findings ... is that children who received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine were more likely than unvaccinated children to develop symptomatic COVID-19 infection with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.91 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.12-7.53...

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense, told The Defender this 'equates to a statistically significant signal where a child 6 months through 4 years old vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech is 191% more likely to be diagnosed with a symptomatic COVID-19.'

Jablonowski said the finding calls into question some of the author’s central claims — that 'there was no difference in risk' among vaccinated and unvaccinated children, and that COVID-19 vaccination is still advisable 'to reduce severe illness.'

'The statement of ‘no difference in risk’ is a lie of omission,' Jablonowski said. 'It is an unignorable trend that the vaccinated children have more symptomatic — thus more severe — infections'...

Hulscher said it was significant that CDC scientists authored the study. 'This demonstrates that many scientists within our public health agencies remain committed to reporting the truth, even when it carries significant implications'...

Experts also said the study’s findings contribute to recent calls for a moratorium on the administration of mRNA products."

document
breakthrough cases,COVID-19,fact checking,health statistics,health statistics misleading practices,natural immunity,vaccines