Index Entries

Henry L. Ealy, Michael E. McEvoy, John Nowicki, Monica Sava, and Neil M. Ruggles
March 23, 2021
GreenMedInfo

“During our investigation into the variety of topics this manuscript covers, a theme began to stand out as a consistent concern. Safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 are inexplicably being withheld.

As you read this position paper, you will encounter many similar examples of what appears to be willful misconduct on the part of government agencies supplying inaccurate information to elected officials and the public at large.

While incessant arguments persist regarding the accuracy of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, asymptomatic transmission, dubious projection models, and alleged violations of federal law, the issue that is still inexplicably unresolved is the withholding of safe and effective treatments from millions of people most in need…

We ask, “Is it ethical to withhold evidence-based treatments, proven to be safe and effective, from people in need?” Historically, this question has been answered with a resounding “no.” Yet this is where we find ourselves again: once again, more embroiled in an age-old struggle to an ethical question we have already repeatedly answered correctly. A common ground we must all be able to reach is that it is unethical to withhold evidence-based treatments proven to be safe and effective from people in need.

The Intention of Our Position Paper

The intention of our position paper is to honor our departed and everyone who has sacrificed so much so that we all might live free. In our opinion, discriminate censorship of genuine attempts to help this crisis is a major problem, as has been the repeated suppression of effective treatments for COVID-19…

Detailed empirical evidence matters. This position paper is our effort to provide that detailed empirical evidence for your consideration. Difficult conversations remain, and difficult conversations require the most accurate information available.”

document
COVID-19,medical treatments