Dear Senator/Member,
A Declaration and Urgent Demands: Parliamentary Health Reform Package…
We are a group of medical and scientific professionals who hold concerns regarding the overreach of government control on the freedom of the medical and scientific community, to freely debate medical treatments. The persons to this declaration, hold the view that some or all the following topics and/or these statements are correct, and should be open for public debate by all persons in the profession, without restriction or repercussions:
1. Experimental, inadequately tested medical products were given Provisional Approval. These were not traditional vaccines but new technology with a new mode of action…
2. Despite the Provisional Approval and incomplete data, the public were falsely assured all processes had been followed, and the products were repeatedly pronounced as ‘Safe and Effective’ by Public Health figures and politicians.
3. Effective and cheap off-label drugs for preventing or treating Covid-19 were banned by the TGA. Doctors who used these medicines were subject to legal action and de-registration.
4. No proactive monitoring process to collect safety signals from the injections was put in place in line with the gene therapy ‘vaccine’ roll out.
5. These gene therapy injections did not have the advertised 95% reduction in infection. In fact, there was no significant reduction in infection…
7. Serious side effects began to turn up for medical practitioners. Patients have myocarditis/pericarditis, reactivation of cancers, DNA viruses, myocardial infarctions, strokes, and fatigue syndromes. Hundreds more symptoms and injuries are being reported…
11. The unprecedented number of reports of death, illness, and injury from the ‘vaccines’ in the TGA DAEN system continue to be ignored. Post-mortems were not mandated for these experimental injections. Deaths associated with the ‘vaccines’ continue to be dismissed without post-mortem or pathologic assessment…
The attached proposed amendments to the Therapeutic Goods Act and Health Practitioner Regulation National Law will reduce these unfortunate and preventable outcomes.
We, the below signatories, being Australian health practitioners and scientists, urgently demand through the enactment of the proposed amendments: …”
This paper was published under Free Access Data sharing We support the growing movement to make research more open, because this leads to a fairer, more efficient and accountable research landscape, which will ultimately drive a more effective and faster pace of discovery. We are committed to improving openness, transparency, and reproducibility of research. We support a standard level policy of “Expects” data.