Index Entries

Claudia Chaufan, Natalie Hemsing, and Rachael Moncrieffe
March 20, 2025
Journal of Public Health and Emergency
York University (Canada)

A study of health care workers' experiences during the COVID-19 vaccine mandates in Canada.

"Key Findings

  • Most healthcare workers (HCWs) who completed the open-ended question or options in the survey were unvaccinated and had been terminated due to vaccination mandates. Six key themes regarding HCWs experiences of vaccination mandates were identified: (I) policies conflicting with scientific evidence and professional practice; (II) conflicts with medical ethics; (III) unacknowledged or dismissed personal hardships; (IV) unacknowledged or dismissed physical harms; (V) discrimination against unvaccinated HCWs and patients; and (VI) negative impacts on patient care.

What is known and what is new?

  • ... [T]his study explores the perspectives on vaccine mandates of a purposive sample of primarily unvaccinated Ontario HWCs, focusing on their decision-making processes, the mandates' impact on their lives, and HCWs' views on how mandates have affected patient care.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

  • The study revealed a system in Ontario healthcare settings that undermines informed consent and causes significant harm for non-compliant HCWs and patients. These harms and ethical violations, compounded by the lack of evidence that COVID-19 vaccination stops viral transmission, call for an urgent reconsideration of the practice of vaccine mandates in the health sector."

.

document
bioethics,COVID-19,credentialed opposition,healthcare,human rights,informed consent,international law,mandates,medical freedom,medical treatment protocols,mental health,vaccines