Index Entries

Clare Craig
June 2024

"I am submitting this witness statement in my capacity as the Co-chair of the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART), as well as a qualified doctor and diagnostic pathologist. HART is a membership association of volunteer doctors, healthcare professionals, statisticians, scientists, and other experts who have expressed concerns about policies related to covid."

"Executive Summary

Above anything else covid saw a betrayal of foundational medical ethics. Informed consent could only occur if the public had been given an honest appraisal of the likely problems and significant unknowns regarding the covid vaccines. When the vaccines failed to live up to the ambitious claims made about them they rightly feel betrayed.

The evidence of safety issues was present in the clinical trials and in every measure undertaken since. This evidence was ignored...

By ignoring the first two weeks after vaccination and labelling these individuals as ‘unvaccinated’ for this time-period (claiming the vaccine couldn’t be ‘working’ yet so they still are classed as unvaccinated) the illusion of benefit was created in paper after paper. The big picture impact on the population as a whole showed that the claimed benefits did not exist. The lack of benefit confirms the fraud from the clinical trial data, reinforces the lack of informed consent and means every harm outweighed the benefit at an individual level...

3. Conclusion

In light of the evidence provided, it is clear that the handling of the covid vaccines resulted in a betrayal of public trust and medical ethics. Key to this was regulatory failure in allowing these products to bypass important safety testing coupled with a failure to communicate the risks and uncertainties. The evidence has been selectively reported but nevertheless points not only to a failure of the vaccines to deliver promised benefits but also to a significant increase in illness and death along with evidence of specific adverse effects that were neither sufficiently monitored nor transparently reported.

This credibility crisis is worsened by systemic failures across multiple levels—from regulatory oversight to the lack of proper reporting of adverse events—casting serious doubt on the integrity of public health institutions. The widespread promotion of vaccination, characterised by coercion rather than informed consent, represents not just a policy failure but a moral one, particularly when the risks may outweigh the benefits for many individuals."

 

document
adverse events,COVID-19,credentialed opposition,health statistics misleading practices,vaccines