"Established in September 2022, Doctors for Patients UK (DfPUK) was formed by a group of doctors alarmed by the disregard of medical ethics—a trend that endangers patient care and eroded public trust amid the Covid-19 pandemic. The group serves as a platform for sharing and voicing concerns and discussing critical health issues, which have been appropriated by global interests...
After reviewing member testimonies, the authors reaffirmed their conclusion that the risks of mRNA and other Covid-19 vaccines outweigh their benefits. This further analysis compelled the creation of The Hope Accord, a petition that calls for an immediate halt and re-evaluation of these products."
This PDF includes written testimonials from:
- Dr. Dean Patterson, MBChB, FRCP, Consultant Cardiologist & General Physician, Guernsey
- Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Emeritus Professor of Oncology, St Georges Hospital, London
- Mr. T. James Royle, MBChB, FRCS (Ed) MMedEd
- Mr. Ian McDermott, MB BS, MS, FRCS(Tr&Orth), FFESM(UK), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, London Sports Orthopaedics, Honorary Professor Associate, Brunel University
- Mr. Tony Hinton MB ChB, FRCS, FRCS(ORL), Consultant Surgeon
- Dr. Ali Ajaz, MBBS, BSc, MRCPsych, PGCert
- Dr. Scott Mitchell, MD
- Dr. Kathy Grieg, RCGP, MBChB hons, Functional medicine IFM
- Dr. Caroline Lapworth MBChB, General Practitioner
- Dr. Ayiesha Malik MBChB, MRCGP (2014), LFHom
- Dr Tim Kelly, MB BCh, PGCert Clin Sci, Locum Junior Doctor & Systems Analyst
"Summary
Contributing doctors from a range of specialities, express their concerns regarding the safety and management of Covid-19 vaccines, observing adverse reactions and systemic issues within the healthcare system. Their concerns encompass several key points:
- Adverse Reactions: Doctors report observing severe and frequent adverse reactions following Covid-19 vaccination, including cardiac issues, blood clots, autoimmune disorders, and potential links to rapid cancer progression. These observations are reported both from within their patient populations and from personal experiences.
- Systemic Healthcare Failures: There is a notable disappointment with the lack of support from healthcare institutions like the National Health Service (NHS), which are perceived as dismissing or inadequately addressing vaccine injuries. Many doctors report a lack of a dedicated response or treatment pathways for patients suffering from vaccine-related injuries...
- Professional and Social Backlash: Doctors raising concerns about vaccine safety and the handling of the pandemic response describe facing professional consequences, ostracism, or hostility from peers and authorities. This includes threats of investigation and punitive actions from regulatory bodies like the General Medical Council (GMC).
- Challenges in Patient Care and Ethics: The doctors raise concerns about the ethical implications of not fully informing patients about the potential risks associated with vaccines, particularly in vulnerable groups. Issues such as coerced consent, lack of transparent dialogue, and the disregard for established ethical practices in medicine are highlighted.
- Call for Transparency and Reform: The doctors advocate for more open dialogue, thorough investigation of vaccine safety and systemic reforms. They stress the importance of informed consent, bodily autonomy, patient-centred care, the necessity of supporting medical professionals who voice concerns and the establishment of dedicated services to address and study vaccine injuries.
- Scepticism of Public Health Strategies: Criticisms are directed at public health policies, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, which are seen as disproportionate and causing more harm than benefit.
The overarching demand is for a reassessment of vaccine safety protocols, better support for vaccine injured individuals, protection for whistleblowers and a more ethical, transparent approach to public health decision-making. The doctors underscore the need for a healthcare environment that respects scientific integrity, prioritises patient safety and maintains open channels of communication among
professionals and with the public. Their testimonies follow below."